Got the VFO finished last night but ran into some problems. More on that
in the Soapbox.
vfo-finished-006.jpg - Overview
of the VFO with the 10-turn pot wired in.
vfo-finished-007.jpg -
Close up, looking up at the trimmer caps, the MVAM109 and the
partially hidden by C4 T50-7 (L1).
vfo-finished-008.jpg -
Slightly different angle, shows T5 and Q2 and Q3.
vfo-finished-009.jpg -
Another overview from a different angle.
vfo-finished-010.jpg -
Nice shot showing L1.
vfo-finished-017.jpg - Now we get
to the questions; Here is an O'scope shot of the output of the
secondary of T5 with POT1 turned fully counter-clockwise. Volts/Div is
50mV and the probe is a 10x attenuator, so each hash mark is 500mV, or
half a volt. The amplitude peak-to-peak is about 1.5v with POT1 at
this setting.
vfo-finished-019.jpg - Here is an
O'scope shot of the output of the secondary of T5 with POT1 turned
fully clockwise. Volts/Div is still set at 50mV. The amplitude
peak-to-peak is about 2.5v with POT1 at this setting.
The question is; is this OK?
By the way, the frequency is calculated as follows; The Time/Div
setting is .1uS, or .0000001 of a second per hash mark on the X axis.
In the first image, the period is approximately 4.79 x .1uS, or 4.79 x
.0000001. Frequency is the reciprocal of the period, so 1/ 4.79x.0000001,
which equals 2.088Mhz. Sure enough, placing the rig next to a receiver
shows the VFO oscillating at 2.085 (I did fiddle TC4 prior to this
however).
The second o'scope image shows a period of about 4.6uS - I'll leave
the frequency calculation as an excercise for the reader (always
wanted to say that!).
Soapbox |
Problem:
There is a conspiracy among potentiometer vendors to frustrate me in
perpetuity. I initially wired POT1 incorrectly and had an almost
working VFO for quite sometime. Only problem was, when I would get
near the end of the tuning range, it would go backwards (fast). After
finding the correct pinout of POT1, the VFO worked.
The range of this VFO is from 2.085MHz to about 2.170MHz - I think this
OK, but I'm waiting to hear from the rest of the crew about it.
I also have the peak-to-peak situation outlined above. I'll report
back here when it's sorted out.
10/25/2001 - Answers to questions
The answer to widening the VFO was to replace TC3 (a 3-10pf trimmer) with
a 22pf NPO cap.
The voltage peaking described above was caused by too little
capacitance on C12 which caused T5 to not come into tune until nearing
the top of the frequency span. I Increased the capacitance of C12 by
adding a 33pf NPO cap in parallel. The unloaded output of the
secondary of T5 is now 3v p2p at the bottom of the range, peaking at
5v p2p at the middle of the range and 3v p2p at the top end. I
soldered in a 100 ohm resistor at the output of the secondary of T5 to
act as a load - there is very little variation in output in this
configuration.
|
|
|