Combined
CenterFed and OffCenterFed
Ground Plane Antenna This article presents
the concept of combining the characteristics of a conventional Ground
Plane Antenna
(GPA) with the elements of an OffCenter Fed (OCF) antenna. Various configurations provide a simple way
for
multiband performance and an unusual way to obtain relatively strong
directional gain from a very ordinary vertical antenna. Basics: CenterFed (CF)
Ground
Plane Vertical Antenna The “Vertical” part is a quarterwavelength long radiating monopole. The “Ground Plane” consists of at least two, sometimes three, but typically four radiating elements symmetrically extended to the side. Each element of the ground plane is the same length as the vertical. The antenna is fed where the vertical monopole and ground plane meet hence the term “CenterFed”. The impedance is around 35 to 40 ohms when the ground plane is parallel to the ground. By angling the arms of the ground plane downward, the impedance rises. At about 4045 degrees down angle the impedance matches a 50ohm coaxial cable. The radiation pattern is a perfect circle. However, if the arms of the ground plane are not RF identical due to unequal length or interaction with nearby objects, the RF concentrates into the most resonant arm(s). The radiation pattern becomes stronger in the direction of greater RF.
Basics: OffCenterFed
(OCF) Ground
Plane Vertical Antenna (GPA) When the ground plane is parallel to the ground, a second way of matching coaxial cable is by feeding the antenna “OffCenter”. As the feedpoint is moved from the usual 50% vertical to 50% ground plane ratio, impedance rises. With two radials there is a match when the vertical is 70% and the two radials are 30% of the halfwavelength. With three radials the match ratio is 75% to 25%. With four radials the match ratio is 80% to 20%. Fine tuning can be done by adjusting the ratio or the angle of the radials. With either method of coax matching, elevation is a consideration. For tuning, be aware that the resonant frequency varies with height. The lowest frequency occurs at onequarter wavelength. The highest frequency occurs at onehalf wavelength. After the highest point the frequency peaks decline steadily at each additional halfwavelength in elevation. For distance communication (DX), the “Takeoff Angle” (TOA) of radiation is lowest when the feed point is a halfwavelength over ground. Each additional halfwave elevation adds another ring of radiation at a higher takeoff angle. Feedpoint elevations between each half wavelength have a strong vertical dome of radiation hence are less desirable.. Basics: Combining
OffCenterFeed
with CenterFeed A
circular radiation pattern for an elevated vertical antenna requires
only two radials. Interestingly, radials
in pairs are the key to combining OffCenterFeed with CenterFeed in
an
ordinary ground plane antenna. This simple concept opens the door to
multiband
operation Consider a
theoretical
centerfed, 8meter (37.5 mHz), ground plane antenna with 4radials. A
halfwavelength is 4 meters long therefore the quarter wave vertical
element is
2meters long. Each of the radials are
2meters
long angled downward at 45°.
Lengthen the same two radials to be 3meters long. With the 2meter vertical element, the resonant halfwavelength is now 5meters long (30 mHz) and the two radials are now fed 2/5 to 3/5 offcenter. The resonant frequency is lower by 1/5. The antenna is now a dual band 8meter and 10meter ground plane. Figure 2.
Postulate
A common ground plane antenna with four radials can operate on a second frequency by merely adjusting the length of two opposing radials.
Experimental To explore this concept, a prototype ground plane antenna (GPA) was constructed using telescoping vertical and radials. The telescoping elements could extend from 8 to 24 inches. The angle of the four radials was adjustable. The antenna was mounted approximately onehalf wavelength high on PVC tubing and connected to a Sark110 antenna analyzer by 9 feet of RG58/U 50 Ohm coaxial cable. Three ferrite “beads” were attached to the coax at the base of the antenna to prevent instabilities by common mode currents that develop from offcenter feed. Frequencies used were in the range from 96 mHz to 225 mHz. The starting
point was to configure a typical GPA with four radials angled downward
at 45°, all the same length as the vertical element, ie.
CenterFed. The
OffCenterFeed (OCF) study was to systematically adjust the length of
two opposing radials and record the development and characteristics of
the second frequency. Because of the wide frequency range
involved and the physical limits of the telescoping elements, these
data were taken in two stages:
Results In both stages, length was changed by intervals of onetenth of the initial length: Short= 1.0, 0.9, 0.8, etc. Long= 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, etc. Combining the two results produces a table of frequencies corresponding to the fractional length of the radial pair from 2.0 to 0.1 times the initial length (1.0). To generalize these data for practical use, the experimental frequencies found (F2) were converted to frequency ratio (F2/F1) from 0.6 to 2.2 relative to the initial frequency of the GPA (F1). See Figure 3 below.
Practical
Use Questions Q.
I have a 6 meter (F1) ground plane antenna. Can it also be used
on 2 meters? Q.
Can the 6 meter (F1) ground plane antenna be used on 10 meters? Q.
Then how about a 10 meter (F1) ground plane on 12 meters? F2/F1 =
24.9/28.4 = 0.88. Yes Q.
Or 15 meters? 21.2/28.4 = 0.75. Yes When
the radials are lengthened the amount of change is abruptly less.
The slope of the curve becomes shallower. Note also the
discontinuity between 1.0 and 1.2 Fractional Length. In this
range there is not enough change to clearly separate the second
frequency, F2, from the initial frequency, F1. This throws the F1
slightly off frequency. Rule:
When lengthening a Radial Pair the increase in Fractional Length should
be 1.2 or greater.
Table of Multiband Possibilities Frequency obtained by using F2/F1 Frequency Ratio or Radial Length adjustment Greyed
areas are impractical and should be avoided
It is posible to both lengthen and shorten pairs of radials. This gives two widely spaced bands. For example a 30 meter GPA can become a 20 meter and 40 meter antenna by lengthening one pair of radials by around 1.8 and shortening the other pair by around 0.6. By using the ratios or radial lengths from table above it can be seen that;
Antenna Modeling
Just about any length of a conductor can be shaped and adjusted to the radiate the radio frequency (RF) output from a transmitter. Judging how well it radiates and how it could be made better are the eternal questions. Methods such as field strength meters and AB switching between reference antennas are complemented by computer modeling which can numerically characterize and visualize RF radiation. In the antenna just described, modeling is particularly useful in coming to terms with the relatively complex interactions revealed from the manipulations of the prototype antenna. For this unusual set of requirements, an antenna model^{1} using 4NEC2 software^{2} was developed utilizing spherical geometry. This allows numerous radiating elements each with the unique ability to be positioned at any compass heading and any angle up or down as well as being of different lengths or at any offcenter feed ratio. Basics: The Model What does the manipulation of two opposing radials do to the radiation pattern of a centerfed ground plane antenna? To study this question a 100 mHz ground plane antenna model was created with a quarterwave vertical and four opposing radials of the same length, in other words, centerfed. Conditions: #14 AWG elements; feedpoint elevation optimized at ½wavelength over “real ground”; “Autosegmentation on” to adjust for the varying length of radials; radials angled downward at 45°. F1 characteristics at 100 mHz are reported as: Z Ohms = 49.9 SWR = 1.00 Gain = 1.65 dBi Takeoff angle (red lines) = 15° Half Power Beamwidth (green lines) = 5° to 35° See polar radiation graph, Figure 4. The F1 initial tuned frequency of 100 mHz only occurs at one point, when all four radials are the same length*, Radial Ratio = 1. In other words, this is the only time when the antenna is a simple ground plane antenna with the RF current in the lower part distributed equally four ways. At any other time the system functions as two antennas with two of the radials offcenter fed at some frequency other than 100 mHz.
Effects of Variable Length Radials The study is to systematically change the length of the Variable Radials. The Radial Ratio varies from 0.1 to 2.0 times the length of the vertical element using steps of 0.1. All radials are angled at 45°. The results were recorded for the Gain, mHz frequency and SWR. First, what happens to the antenna's primary frequency of 100 mHz (F1) as the Radial Ratio is changed? The answer: "There is very little change". See Figure 5 below. Gain (Red line, square marker) is basically flat varying only by the dip seen at the 1.1 Ratio. This is where the 0.1 additional length is not sufficient to produce a second distinct frequency. Frequency mHz (Green line, X marker) shows only a slight rise. When the variable radials are shortened, the initial 100 mHz rises about 0.6 mHz higher near Radial Ratio =1 and immediately rises to 0.9 mHz higher. When radials are lengthened, the initial 100 mHz starts at 1.9 mHz higher near Radial Ratio =1 and tapers down to 1.2 mHz higher at the longest configuration. SWR (Blue line, asterisk marker) is unchanged in the shorter ratios and rises slightly in the longer configurations. The bump at 1.1 Ratio is where the additional length is not sufficient to produce a second distinct frequency. Far Field Radiation Pattern (Figure 6) is not effected as the length of the variable radials is changed from 0.4 to 1.8 Ratio. The
conclusion of this modeling study is that the centerfed, tworadial
ground plane portion of the antenna is essentially unaffected by any
adjustments to make an OCF ground plane by using the other two opposing
radials.
OffCenter Feed Impedance In general a radiating wire can be fed at any point offcenter without affecting the resonant frequency. The exception occurs very near the ends. At the center of the wire the RF radiation on both sides is equal. In this balanced condition impedance is lowest and there is minimum RF reflected back on the feed line. When feeding offcenter, the both impedance and RF reflection increase due to unbalanced RF in the two arms. Because of the unusual nature of the dual frequency GPA the usual offcenter impedance graphs do not apply. To remedy this lack of information a model for a vertical wire with a 45 degree bend was developed. The length of the bent lower part of antenna systematically adjusted according to the radialtovertical ratio seen in Figure 5. For each adjustment in radial ratio the model found a new resonant frequency. The resulting antenna characteristics were recorded for each point and the range of Z Ohm impedance values were normalized to the lowest value. Thus generalized, a graph can then be used to estimate impedance points of any similar OCF antenna. See Figure 7 below. Looking at the Relative Z Impedance line (red line) it can be seen that adjusting the Radial Ratio up to 0.4 times shorter or up to 2 times longer than the vertical will produce desirable Relative Z Impedance values… no higher than about 1.5 times the center impedance. An example: If the ground plane achieves a centerfed impedance of 56 ohms before changing the length of two radials, it can be expected that the offcenter impedance will rise no higher than about 1.5 x 56 = 84 ohms. This corresponds to a SWR50 of 84/50 = 1.68:1. When OCF antennas are discussed we commonly hear terms about the feed point ratio such as: “onethird from the end”, or “1/3 2/3”, or “0.330.67”. For this, Figure 7 has a convenient OffCenter Feed Ratio graph (Blue diamond line) related to the Radial Ratio. Notice that the OFC Ratio changes very slowly above Center. Consider vertical length = 1: When the Radial Ratio length is 2 times the vertical length, the total radial+vertical length is 3, therefore the OffCenter Feed point is at 2/3… or 0.67 on the graph. Conversely: when the Radial Ratio length is 0.5 times the vertical length, the total radial+vertical length is 1.5 therefore the OffCenter Feed point is 0.5/1.5 = 1/3… or 0.33 on the graph. Modeling OffCenter Feed When centerfed and offcenterfed antennas are combined the simple relationship in Figure 7 is only a guide to what is happening. However, more complex sum and difference harmonic interactions exist. To better follow what happens, the 4NEC2 antenna model was used was to vary the length (frequency) of the Variable Radials by a Radial Ratio from 0.1 to 2.0 times the length of the vertical element. The OCF results for Frequency MHz, Gain dBi and SWR were recorded at each new F2 frequency created by the change in length. See Figure 8. The predicted Frequency mHz curve (Green line, X marker) is no surprise and agrees with the curve in Figure 3 which was derived from the experimental work with the prototype ground plane antenna. As expected from Figure 8, the high impedance of short Radial Ratios causes the SWR (Blue line, asterisk marker) to become excessive (over 40:1 at 0.1 Radial Ratio). This is in good agreement with results from the prototype antenna work where studies below 0.4 Radial Ratio were terminated because of high SWR. However, instead of seeing a smooth SWR curve mirroring the smooth impedance curve in Figure 7, interactive bumps are apparent at 0.6 as well at 0.9 ratios. Also the SWR line does not have the usual smooth rising curve above 1.0 Radial Ratio. Instead, it goes upward almost straight diagonally. Similarly, the Gain (Red line, square marker) rapidly climbs from 0.4 Radial Ratio to around 5 dBi but falls in almost a straight slant when nearing the 1.0 Radial Ratio. Something is causing these unexpected results. The rise in Gain means a change in the typical circular radiation pattern of a vertical antenna. To compare the 3D changes in appearance as seen from the same angle as in Figure 6, see Figure 9 below. It provides a detailed look at Radial Ratios of 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8 for:
0.4 Radial Ratio = 165 mHz or 1.65 half wave 0.6 Radial Ratio = 140 mHz or 1.4 half wave 0.8 Radial Ratio = 120 mHz or 1.2 half wave The high angle ground radiation pattern is due to the half wave elevation of the second frequency, F2. Recall that the 100 mHz antenna model is set at ½ wavelength over ground. Recall also “Feedpoint elevations between each half wavelength have a strong vertical dome of radiation hence are less desirable”.
Horizontal and Vertical Components The 4NEC2 antenna modeling software provides the means to view independently the horizontal and vertical components that make the total radiation pattern. Figure 10 below shows these three radiations for the 45°, Ratio=0.8 configuration. The combined Total radiation pattern on the left picture has more gain than either of the other two as seen by the purple coloration on the corners between radials. The four lobe Horizontal radiation pattern in the center picture is the common characteristic of this antenna whenever two frequencies develop. Each lobe is formed between each pair of radials and has a takeoffangle of 20°. The lobes remain relatively unchanged no matter what the second frequency, F2, may be. The low angle circular portion of the Vertical radiation pattern in the right picture is typical of a ground plane antenna. The bulges at higher angle depend on the frequency difference created by the second frequency. As pointed out above, this 0.8 ratio is 120 mHz or 1.2 half wave. As the ratio approaches 0.9 the frequency is 113 mHz or 1.1 half wave causing the bulge to further merge into the lower lobe. At a ratio of 1 the antenna is a single frequency, 100 Hz ground plane with the half wave pattern as seen in Figure 6. This phenomenon is strictly a function of two different frequencies created from a combined CF and OFC antenna. A different but similar phenomenon is related to antenna feed point elevation and ground reflectivity Antenna Feedpoint Elevation The perfect height for an antenna is when fed at one half of the ground reflected wavelength. This is the balance point with the least upward radiation and the most lateral radiation. In contrast, the poorest height is between each half wave where the most upward radiation occurs. This applies to all antennas but the unusual radiation patterns in Figure 10 created by dual frequency need to be differentiated from the unusual radiation patterns created by elevation. From Figure 10 above we select the 45°, Ratio=0.8 “3D Far Field Radiation Pattern” for study. We will look at how it changes with increasing elevation in Figure 11 below. All modeling discussed so far uses a perfect half wave elevation. However, for this study the elevation at 0.5 Wave Length will be increased in steps of 0.25 wave length to “see” the changes in the dual frequency radiation pattern. At 0.75 Wave Length there is a dome of ground reflected radiation rising in the center. This similar to the Ratio=0.6 seen in Figure 10 which was caused by a difference in frequency… not by elevation. As the antenna rises to 1.0 Wave Length the reflection dome enlarges and morphs to form a second lateral lobe at a higher radiation angle. At 1.25 Wave Length a second reflected radiation dome rises, then gradually expands and flattens to become another higher angle lateral lobe at 1.5 Wave Length. This dometolobe, dometolobe pattern repeats each half wavelength as antenna elevation increases. Three lobes = three half wavelengths. Four lobes = four half wavelengths, etc. each at progressively higher takeoff angles. Radials at 90° A conventional ground plane antenna has four radials angled downward at 45°. To keep the dualfrequency concept simple two opposing radials were shortened or lengthened to create the second frequency. The results seen in Figure 8 were good when shortened but not good when lengthened. Work with the prototype antenna determined that longer variable radials gave a good match for 50 Ohm coaxial cable when adjusted to be around 90°. Concurrent antenna modeling was in general agreement but was not refined enough to accurately predict the highest angles found in the prototype by the antenna analyzer. To maintain the simplicity concept a followup study was made with the variable length radials at 90°. The results are summarized in Figure 12 below. The Frequency mHz curve (Green line, X marker) has virtually no change from that when the radials are at 45° therefore the predicted frequencies of the tables in Figure 4 are good with radials at 90°. The Gain dBi (Red line, square marker) rises rapidly to around 5 dBi when the radials are lengthened. This is in contrast to the steady fall seen (Figure 8) with the radials at 45°. However, shortened radials are best served at 45° considering the poor results seen above. SWR (Blue line, asterisk marker) remains remarkably low when the radials are lengthened. It should be noted that the prototype antenna produced the best match with the radials raised above horizontal when the radials were longest. The conclusion: When shortening the F2 radials, use 45°; when lengthening them, use 90°. Lengthening Radials In Figure 12, the rise in Gain (Red line, square marker) means a change in the typical circular radiation pattern of a vertical antenna For comparison Figure 13 below provides 3D views at the same angle as in Figure 7. This provides a detailed look at Radial Ratios of 1.2, 1.6 and 2.0 to see:
1.0 Radial Ratio = 100 mHz or 1.0 half wave (F1) 1.2 Radial Ratio = 93.4 mHz or 0.93 half wave 1.6 Radial Ratio = 77.9 mHz or 0.78 half wave 2.0 Radial Ratio = 67.1 mHz or 0.67 half wave The first thing noticed is that the rectangular radiation pattern seen when the radials are shorter, now has become a broad pattern extending from the long (F2) radials. On the axis of the short (F1) radials, the null becomes deeper as the F2 radials get longer. This is primarily due to the difference between the F1 and F2 frequencies tends to increase the vertical component. Recall that antenna RF radiation patterns reflected from ground tends to be:
Horizontal and Vertical Polarizations The 4NEC2 antenna modeling software provides the means to view independently the horizontal and vertical polarizations that make the total antenna radiation pattern. Figure 14 shows how the Horizontal and Vertical radiation patterns make up the "90°, Ratio=1.6" Far Field Radiation Pattern seen in Figure 13 above. The Horizontal radiation pattern shows the four characteristic F1 lobes between each radial. The lobes are a bit plump compared with those of Figure 10 but exhibit little change in TOA at this unfavorable wavelength elevation over ground. The OCF Vertical radiation pattern is from the ground plane formed by the vertical and two F2 radials at 90°. The upward TOA is the ground reflection and is controlled by halfwavelength elevation over ground. It is easy to see how these two lobes fit together with the horizontal lobes to form the wide lobes under the long radials. The Gain is greatest at the corners between radials as indicated by the purple color. The gain under the long radials is the same as the F1 vertical. The net result is a dual frequency GPA with the F2 frequency behaving more like a dipole with around 5 dBi gain but with the nulls broadside rather than off the ends. VHF and UHF with Gain As seen in the information presented in the Table of Multiband Possibilities, dual frequency potential is listed from 40 meters to 10 meters. Below 10 meters the amateur world is replete with dualband antennas. Here are some examples.
Nevertheless, the Combined CenterFed and OffCenterFed Ground Plane technique, as a single frequency ground plane has diversity polarization, a very wide radiation pattern and dipolelike gain. These characteristics could be of interest for monoband antennas for 144, 222, 440 or higher bands. For this purpose the radiation pattern with the most uniform gain pattern is desirable. These conditions are best met with an ordinary ground plane antenna with two radials angled 45° down and the opposing radials at 90° which are lengthened by 25%, or a Radial Ratio=1.25. Monoband Modeling In Figure 15 below: Gain is a broad 3.5 to 5 dBi in the hemisphere of the long horizontal radials. The halfpower horizontal beam width is an impressive 140° of the possible 180° hemisphere. The nulls are 2 to3 dBi aligned with the short radials. This makes the antenna behave similarly to a dipole in that the nulls produce a total of 7 to 8 dB reduction in signals coming from the sides of the horizontal radials… just the opposite of a dipole. Monoband Example Calculate the length of the elements for this ground plane for 144.5 MHz at Ratio=1.25. The vertical/radial length calculation, in inches, derived from antenna modeling is: 2643/mHz = inches In other words: 2643/144.5 mHz = 18.29 inches. This produces an F1 frequency around 156.5 MHz. The F2 frequency can be adjusted anywhere in the 2 meter band according to the length of the 90° radials. By adjusting them to be 1.25 longer (18.29” * 1.25 = 22.9”) the second frequency, F2, will be around 144.5 MHz depending on construction details, the thickness of the elements, their velocity factor and antenna feed point elevation Related to the Table of MultiBand Possibilities, the F2/F1 Ratio of the example antenna using #14 wire, velocity corrected, at half wavelength feed point elevation is: 144.5/156.5 = 0.923 Radial Length at Radial Ratio = 1.25. Characteristics at 144.5 mHz: • Z Ohms: 51.5 +j0.73 • SWR: 1.03 • Gain: 5.12 dBi; Null 2.5 dBi Band width < 2 SWR: 143.8 to 145.5 mHz (Figure 16) Vertical and horizontal diversity polarization. Takeoffangle: 25° with halfpower at 10° and 50° above horizontal. Compared with a dipole the advantages of the Centerfed/OCF ground plane are: • Low SWR • 140° beam width versus the dipole’s 80° beam width • Mixed vertical and horizontal polarization for local communications with dipoles, yagis and repeaters Dipole Characteristics at 144.5 MHz: • Z Ohms: 67.1 –j2.21 • SWR: 1.34 • Gain: 7.4 dBi; Null 4.9 dBi Band width < 2 SWR: 141.6 to 147.6 MHz (Figure 17) Horizontal polarization. Takeoffangle: 25° with halfpower at 15° and 45° above horizontal. This article introduces the concept of combining the characteristics of a conventional four radial Ground Plane Antenna (GPA) with the elements of an OffCenter Fed (OCF) antenna. It is demonstrated that a second OCF frequency, either higher or lower than the GPA frequency, can be created by Shortening or Lengthening two opposing radials Such a modfication produces no appreciable change in the GPA's radiation characteristics. In this way GPAs for two bands can be created from 10 to 40 meters. The second frequency does however produces an interesting radiation pattern with considerable gain. This effect can also be used to advantage in the VHF/UFH frequencies to obtain relatively strong directional gain, monoband performance using this novel form of a GPA. Reference Links:: 1. http://www.qsl.net/kk4obi/Models/KK4OBI%20model%20%20OCF%20Vertical%204Radials.html Spherical geometry based 4NEC2 antenna model. Ground plane with 4radials.
2. http://www.qsl.net/4nec2/ Free NEC based antenna modeler and optimizer.
by Arie Voors. 3. http://www.arrowantennas.com/inst/GP146440.pdf Commercial 146440 MHz ground plane antenna with two verticals and 4radials.
by Arrow antenna. 4. http://www.hamuniverse.com/na4it2440groundplane.html The NA4IT "CHEAP" Dual Band 2m/440MHz ground plane antenna with two verticals and tuned radial pairs.
by Scott Duckworth 5. www.hocoares.org/images/2005ARRLHandbookDualantennas&jpole.pdf Page 22.57. K3MF 146/446 MHz ground plane with decoupling stub on vertical and tuned radial pairs
by Wayde Bartholomew. 6. http://www.diyhamantenna.com/index.php/ham/multiband/dualbandgpfor2mand70cm Two verticals and two sets of four radials combined into a composite antenna.
by DIY HAM Antenna 

(Go back) 