call	score	comp.score	qsos	qpts	80q	80s	80c	80z	40q	40s	40c	40z	20q	20s	20c	20z	15q	15s	15c	15z	10q	10s	10c	10z
OT9E	3511248	2028032	2080	5296	213	14	48	12	338	35	65	21	551	50	85	33	630	50	81	30	348	48	64	27
IK2QEI	3475276	1984797	1991	5066	167	13	51	10	337	49	64	19	473	49	82	29	557	52	82	32	457	46	77	31
YL4U	3382056	1997112	2128	5268	221	3	51	10	371	31	69	22	641	50	90	32	623	50	80	30	272	27	69	28
OH1F	3259872	1944624	1958	4851	202	6	52	10	313	29	76	26	614	50	89	31	631	53	93	32	198	26	72	27
RU1A	3165204	1810212	1874	4614	204	5	56	12	373	45	77	27	483	48	85	33	619	51	90	33	195	35	64	25
OM5M	2871595	1732516	1740	4508	155	4	43	9	245	39	60	20	426	47	80	29	578	50	89	32	336	45	62	28

comp. score = estimated score counted with the "real cq ww rules": only DXCC/WAE and zone multipliers and scoring 0p=own country 1p = EU and 3p=DX (estimated because qso amount with the one's own country is not known). You can count DX% from the scores with a formula: (qso points/qsos - 2) * 100%. You can notice that competition would be much harder...(only 80k pts between #1 - #4)

Very interesting to look these breakdowns. Maybe now you can understand the difference of propagation between North Europe and South Europe... YL4U, OH1F and RU1A have BIG antennas comparing to IK2QEI and OT9E. One note is RU1A's good stateside score on 40 & 10 meters comparing to YL4U and OH1F. IK2QEI worked on 40 and 10m almost as many states as on 15 and 20 meters!!

CALL	TOTAL	STATES	ZONES	DXCC	DX+ZONES
OT9E	663	197	123	343	466
IK2QEI	686	209	121	356	477
YL4U	642	161	122	359	481
OH1F	672	164	126	382	508
RU1A	686	184	130	372	502