W5HTW HOME
CW-STORIES
W1AW WINTER
OPERATING
SCHEDULE 2006-07
FREQUENCY AND
EMISSIONS PAGE
GUEST
ARTICLES

FCC EMISSION TYPES

Old cordless phone channels in 49 MHZ band. Other frequencies as well. 

HURRICANE NET FREQUENCIES

ITU MARINE RADIO CHANNELS

SOME SCANNER FREQUENCIES

HAM AM RADIO FREQUENCIES

FRS FREQS

CW PROSIGNS

COMMON Q-SIGNALS

Q-AND-Z SIGNALS

PART 95 FREQS CB, GMR MURS, FRSS

BOAT ANCHOR MANUALS SITE

http://bama.sbc.edu/

 

TOP 1000 FREQUENCIES, BY MONITORING TIMES.

OPERATING
LONG DELAYED ECHOS

I like all the 'old standards' of ham radio operating, and have played with a couple of the digital modes, mostly RTTY using the MMTTY free program for the soundcard.  But I'm a dinosaur, and I enjoy SSB, AM, and CW. 

Though I do operate CW in the low (Extra class) segments of the HF bands, where I find a little DX, I can also be found frequently in the Novice bands on 40 and 80 meters.  One of the things I have long enjoyed doing is moving into the Novice bands on slow-speed CW and helping them to not only just have a QSO, but to practice their Morse.  I've been doing that since the mid 1960s, off and on.  I remember when I was a Novice, having a higher class ham I could talk to on 40 CW was a real thrill.  It gave me code practice, sure, but it also gave me a sense of belonging to the ham community.  It has been my choice to return that favor to the Novices and Tech-Pluses of today.  As no new Novice or Tech Plus licenses are being issued, the Novices who have been stuck on those bands are finding fewer and fewer people to talk to.  If you are on HF CW, try slipping into the Novice bands and give a Novice a break.

From time to time I monitor the FISTS area, around 7055 and 14055 and make a few contacts.  There is a misconception about the FISTS organization, in that non-members seem to think it means excellent code proficiency.  It doesn't.  It is just a show of interest in the mode, and those who participate in the organization do so because they like Morse.  It doesn't guarantee they are top notch at it, but what it does show is they have a real interest in this mode of operation and they are willing to dedicate themselves to it.

Yes, I do operate other modes - SSB and CW, and once in a while, RTTY.  And, I blushingly admit, I even stumble into the 2-meter or 70 cm FM "channels" now and then, but usually to specifically contact someone I know, not to ragchew.

Most of my SSB operation is on traffic nets.  I almost never have a QSO that is not part of a net operation.  Not that I'm against it.  I just am not a "talker!"  That is surprising to those who know me, for I was a radio announcer in several markets, and king of the ad lib.  I was also a radio newsman and did TV voice-overs for commercials.  But as I have grown older I have found less and less to say. 

In my pursuit of my roots, though, I have slowly returning to AM.  But unlike the long-winded AM operators, I just can't "hog the mike" for that period of time.  I say a few sentences at most, then turn it over to someone else.  It is, I suppose, an 'acquired skill,' to drone on for ten minutes, and there was a time I could at least come close to it.  In my early days of ham radio, before I could afford the 'new' SSB radios, I spent most of my operating on AM and CW.  Hopefully I will finally again feel comfortable with the transmitter keyed and the captive audience.

Recently I have experimented with a return to RTTY, using the computer sound card and the Icom 706.  But again, I learned RTTY the old way - FSK, with a separate FSK exciter (I had a Heath Marauder which included FSK) and a TTY converter and an old Model 19 machine clanking away on yellow roll paper.  The sound card does not give me the same sounds, nor does it supply the same smell of machine oil, or the dusty feel of the rolls of paper.  It can't capture "the way it used to be."  So I have not yet become a new RTTY fan, though I am playing with it.

Off and on I've been into VHF FM for thirty years, acquiring my first GE single channel mobile unit in 1970.  I moved to a GE Handie something or other, one of the ones with the big battery in the bottom, and the small round microphone with the coiled cord.  It was two channel and I put it on the 34/94 machine and 146.52.  That was in 1971, in Delaware, and I found I could hit the Baltimore 146.94 repeater from Dover, Delaware.  Interesting, but it wasn't HF.  At the time I was running a Drake TR4C into a 3-element tribander up 60 feet, and working a lot of 20 meter SSB.  Working Baltimore from Dover was not very exciting.

By the mid 70s I had a two way radio shop, though, and was engaged in mobile radio systems installs, sales (Pace) and repair.  Through this business I acquired old FM VHF radios, from makers like Regency, Pace, Johnson, Motorola, GE and RCA, and began converting them to crystal control on 2 meters FM. 

However, my roots in 2 meters came in the late 50s and early 60s, with 2 meter AM, using a variety of radios, from the famous Gonset "Gooney Boxes" to the military surplus SCR522 and ARC-3.  Today I still wish I could find some good 2 meter AM activity, but I've heard none.

Look for me in the Novice 40 and 80 meter bands, or around the FISTS frequencies on 40 and 20 meters.  I also like to hang out in the low end of 10 meter  CW and the low end of 20, 40 and 80.  You may also hear me on the Maritime Mobile Service Net, on 14300 USB, or the Southwest Traffic Net, in the evenings on 3935 LSB. 

Enjoy. 

73

Ed

 

 

 

LDES - LONG DELAYED ECHOS

There are stories told in the cult books of radio signals being heard again years after the radio station left the air.  One such story involved a broadcast AM station that had closed down, yet the radio signal was heard nearly two years after the station went off the air. 

Those stories are like the UFO and ghost stories.  They have no foundation. 

LEDs, though, are very real.  What they are not, are attempts by some alien space craft to contact us.  What they are is an as-yet unexplained electromagnetic phenomena relating to radio waves.  In the 1960s Stanford University's Physics Lab tried to find an explanation for them but LDEs have no apparent useful purpose, so allocating much in the way of scientific time or funds is pretty unlikely.  The study closed with only a few suggestions.

There are some facts available about the standard LDE.  First, it does not show signs of Doppler shift.  It is on frequency, it remains on frequency for the duration, and the pitch, if it is CW, remains steady. 

Secondly, it is rarely a full transmission.  It is segments, often very short segments, only five or six seconds, of  a transmission.  It may not begin at the beginning, and it may not end at the ending of the original transmission.  It is not complete. 

Third it does not fade in or fade out.  It is "there."  At least that is true of the one I heard that was so clearly identifiable.  It turns on, and then it turns off. 

Fourth, they have been showing up LONG before computer sound cards.  While it is possible one or two could be a hoax, it is highly unlikely. 

Fifth, they are not limited to the ham bands.

Sixth, reports of them are mostly in the 3 to 18 mhz range.  Occasionally one is heard above that, and on very rare occasions, one below that.   This could be because most  radio activity is in that range, so it really isn't a defining fact, but it is a point to consider.

MY OWN EXPERIENCE

To my knowledge I have heard only one LDE.  It is possible I have heard others, but did not recognize them as such, perhaps due to crowded band conditions, or other situations.  The one I heard, though, was unmistakable.  To explain it, I have to set the scene a bit.  This was in 1967, in the Far East.

I was a government radio operator/tech at a somewhat isolated radio relay site. We ran a CW net that was used almost entirely for the purpose of establishing contact and setup procedures for RTTY operations.  Hence it carried very little, and very intermittent, CW traffic.  We ran three or four transmitters simultaneously, depending upon time of day.  We ran four receivers (Collins 51J3/R388) models in a console. There was a J38 straight key for our use.  There was also a Frederick Electronics Baudot to Morse converter, that converted 5-level punched paper (or plastic) TTY tape to Morse.  We ran what is typically know as a "guard" frequency.  You've heard them on the marine bands.  It sends something like: VVV VVV VVV DE KGP444 KGP444 KGP444 QSX 4/6/10 K   And then there is silence.  That is the listening period. 

Our machine sent this (and this is a fictitious call sign, not the one we used)

VVV VVV VVV DE AAA123 AAA123 AAA123 VVV VVV VVV DE AAA123 AAA123 AAA123 VVV VVV VVV DE AAA123 AAA123 AAA123 QSX 4/6/10 K  (In the day time the freqs would change to 6/10/13)

That sequence, at 18 wpm, took just about one full minute.  The tape then looped (using "letters" characters) for another full minute, during which time any station could call in.  Because our transmitters were located a couple of miles away, we ran the receivers at full RF gain all of the time.  There was NO muting!  All four receivers were wired to a speaker panel.  That meant any signal heard would be heard throughout the building.  Twice each hour, on the hour and on the half hour, one of us (there were usually only two on duty) would actually sit down at the receivers for "close monitor."  For that, we switched the speakers to a panel down near the desktop, and we would sit for two minutes and monitor.  At all other times, the operator was away from the position and doing other things, so he had to be able to hear the R388s above all the Teletype noise in the building - and we had a LOT of such noise!  Motors for printers and machines, plus air conditioning, fans, and the like.  So the receivers were very loud.

When our transmitters keyed, the AGC action of the receivers served to mute them, as we kept the AGC slow.  The first "beep" of the CW shut down the AGC, which prevented any full breakin.  There was no other muting.  Just pretty much receiver overload!

Now the scene is set.  It is not close monitor time, and I, with my partner, am doing other work in the RTTY section.  We grow accustomed to hearing the receivers go dead as our own transmitters overload them.  Then the background noise returns. 

Suddenly we hear:  VV DE AAA123 AAA123 AAA123 VVV   Then it's gone.  It lasted perhaps five or six seconds.  It did not fade in, it did not fade out.  It "turned on' and then it "turned off."  It was our keying.  At our speed, and automatic.  It was strong, but nowhere near strong enough to kick the AGC and overload the receivers.  It was not strong enough to even "thump" them.  It was simply a fairly strong CW signal. 

For an instant I thought it was someone calling us.  Since that did not happen unless there was a problem, I moved quickly to the console.  I stopped our automatic keying and I listened.  No one on any of the frequencies.  I sent "QRZ DE AAA123 K" with the hand key.  Got no response.  I tried that maybe three times.  No one was out there.  Of course I was keying all four transmitters simultaneously, so no matter what frequency he had called in on, I would hear him. 

Then it dawned on me!  I had heard "DE AAA123!"  He had been identifying as my station!  Not AAA123 DE AAB321, for example.  It was "DE ME!" 

By sheer luck, we had been running a slow speed monitor tape on another receiver in a different rack.  That was a rack with two  Collins 51S1 receivers,  that we used to monitor other things, but it had been set up to monitor a couple of frequencies, and I had, earlier in the afternoon, set one of those two receivers on one of our guard frequencies.  The other was on some other frequency. 

What if, I thought, the echo had been on that particular guard channel?  I had no way of knowing which of the console receivers had picked up the signal but it was early evening, and we had been about to close down the 13 mhz guard, as it was no good for us at night, so it wasn't likely it would be there.  I could be on our 4, 6 or 10 mhz frequencies, and there was no way of knowing.  But the 51S1 was on the 6 meg guard frequency.  What if! 

I ran the tape back.  Yes, indeedy, it had been on the 6 mhz guard frequency.  And I had a tape of it.  Not only that, because because the four channel recorder used one of its channels to permanently monitor a highly accurate 1 KHZ oscillator, I could now tell precisely what time the signal had been recorded, using our test gear designed for that purpose. 

All that told me nothing.  Except it was not one of our field stations.  It was not our own transmitter being keyed by our keyer.  It was a received signal, and in ham language would have been RST589.  We gave it a QRK5, QSA5.  The only thing I knew for sure about it now was it had been on our 6 MHZ frequency, not on the four or 10 mhz one. 

I made a copy of that segment of the tape, as it was something we wanted our technical staff to analyze for us.  They did, and learned nothing more.  I kept the tape for a few years but finally erased it. 

Shortly after the actual occurance, (perhaps a few months) which neither my coworker or I understood at the time, I happened across a story on LDEs.  And then we knew what we had heard.  Again I played the tape several times, but garnered no information from it. 

Except one thing.  The "echo" had begun 16 seconds after the end of our transmission.  But it had not begun at the beginning.  It had not echo'ed our entire transmission, only a few seconds of it. 

All this took place outside the USA. 

Some things we did know.  It was not ham operators.  It was not a hoax.  It was not foreign intelligence.  It was not one of our own transmitters.  It was not a recording.  (thank about that one, and why you know it was not an audio recording!)   It was not one of our field stations.  It did not fade.  It had no Doppler.  It was our keying, at our speed.  It was reasonably strong, but not enough to trigger AGC on the receiver.  It was very clear, with no QRM.  It was in the 6 MHZ band. 

I have never heard another one.  I have some theories about LDEs, but I'm no scientist, so I just keep them to myself, mostly.  I think the key, though, is the word 'ducting.' 

Have Fun.