My Radio E-Mail
The Winlink2000 (WL2K) system
I use Radio e-mail quite often via the Winlink 2000 system (WL2K in short). This system was started by a group of American Radio Amateurs for the Radio Amateurs on the go and for Emergency Communications. Many Radio Amateurs have installed numerous HF/VHF/UHF Nodes all over the World that are also connected to Internet so there are more than 100 HF Trimode RMS PACTOR/WINMOR/RPR Access Points with frequency scanning, 230 VHF/UHF RMS AX5 PACKET Access Points, only for Radio Amateurs. APRSlink uses hundreds VHF APRS IGATES in every part of the World. This system can be used by Radio Amateur operators globally for sending/receiving e-mail, download Weather Maps, Weather Reports and other useful information.
I can access this system in many ways:
-
From home or when portable by utilising PACTOR 2, 3 or 4 on HF with my P4dragon, SCS PTC-II or SCS PTC-IIe modems or by utilising RPR with my SCS PTC-II or SCS Tracker/DSP TNC and my ASUS eeePC701 or 901 netbooks using Airmail 2000 version 3.5.025 by Jim Corenman KE6RK.
Pactor 2 has a net throughput of 700 bps (1200 bps with compression) with 4 speedlevels using a bandwidth of only 500 Hz.
Pactor 3 has a net throughput of 3600 bps (5200 bps with compression) with 6 speedlevels using a bandwidth of 2200 Hz.
Pactor 4 has a net throughput of 5500 bps (10500 bps with compression) with 10 speedlevels using a bandwidth of 2400 Hz.
Robust Packet has a speed of 300 or 600 bps but as SCS says it can be pushed up to 1200 bps and more, although we have not seeing any firmware for speeds higher than 600 bps yet. It uses 8 x MSK carriers and only needs a 500 Hz wide channel.
-
I can also use APRSlink with my VX-8E or TH-D7E on APRS when I operate walking Portable and all I have in my pocket is my VX-8E or TH-D7E.
-
Also by using VHF/UHF PACKET Radio with my TH-D7E and ASUS eeePC701 or 901 with Airmail2000 software v 3.5.025 by Jim Corenman KE6RK, AGWPE by SV2AGW and AMPE by KG9OG.
-
Finally I could do "the same" but with a SLOWER and a lot LESS ROBUST HF Digital Mode called WINMOR (soon to become ARDOP) (a soundcard HF ARQ Digital Mode) using my QUAD Core Windows 7 Desktop PC. HF WINMOR is supposed to be as fast as Pactor 2 by design, but it can get close to Pactor 2 only when HF conditions are perfect, but it is not as robust as Pactor 2 when there is QRM/QRN/QSB/multipath distortion etc. Of course it doesn't go anywhere near Pactor 3 which was the original goal of it's author, never mind Pactor 4. WINMOR can't work efficiently with a cheap netbook such as an ASUS eeePC701 or 901, because Netbooks don't have enough computing power. I have noticed that WINMOR, just like any protocol that uses a soundcard instead of a hardware modem, has too many issues with O/S latency, that is why they do not use synchronous ARQ mode, so I'm not so sure if it is any good for Portable Operations or for EMCOMM use! It is cheaper though and if you can't afford an SCS PTC-IIe (which costs as much as a cheap HF Radio) or the newest SCS P4dragon (net throughput with compression is 10500 bps) in order to use HF Pactor, then it can be a good solution for your Radio E-mail needs provided you have a fast PC (more expensive than a slow PC that a Pactor modem needs) with less latency issues, such as a Desktop PC. You also need a Good, thus expensive 2nd SoundCard, or a Signalink SLUSB interface, plus the cost of WINMOR, which is $39 in order to get rid of WINMOR's NAG Screen. If you do not have a new high power PC with a good SoundCard, you need to spend $600 - $1000 for a QUAD Core, about $120 for a Signalink Interface and $39 for WINMOR. You should also be prepared to make, and keep making tedious SoundCard adjustments, CONTINUOUSLY, in order to keep WINMOR working in an acceptable order! Windows is notorious for altering the SoundCard Levels, anytime it feels like it and they keep changing they way they treat Soundcards from one version to the next. It is never the same! These are WINDOWS inherent faults and these make most SoundCard Modes unattractive to me except perhaps for RTTY, SSTV and the UZ7HO Soundmodem which is the best 300 baud PACKET RADIO DECODER, better than any TNC including the SCS Tracker in 300 baud AFSK PACKET mode!
So this Winlink 2000 Radio E-mail system is extremely useful especially when I am on my holidays or somewhere without an Internet feed. You can contact me on SV1UY @ WINLINK.ORG (use either capital or small letters) even when I walk on the mountains. I will receive your e-mail in my VX-8E HT via APRSlink. Mobile phones do not work on the mountains but APRS or HF PACTOR do. When I am near a city with an RMS PACKET Node, I can also access this Node via PACKET Radio too, otherwise I use HF PACTOR to access any RMS PACTOR Node via HF.
If you send an e-mail to my radio e-mail address just remember to precede the subject line of your message with "//WL2K " and a space after it, without the quotes, for example [Subject: //WL2K (then any normal subject)]. and keep it short. This is Winlink 2000's anti-SPAM mechanism. I can also receive attachments (pictures, text, zip files, etc.) when I have access to HF PACTOR 3 or PACKET Radio.
Of course if you are a Winlink 2000 user, you just have to address your message to SV1UY without using the @WINLINK.ORG part after my callsign.
The great thing about the Winlink 2000 system is that I can receive my e-mail via radio no matter where I am in the world, and I do not have to inform the system like the WhitePages of the old PACKET MAIL FBBBBS system about which is your nearest BBS. My e-mail is just stored in Winlink 2000's wordlwide servers and I can pick it up using HF PACTOR, HF WINMOR, APRSlink via APRS, VHF/UHF PACKET RADIO, telnet if I have no radio equipment with me and I have internet connection in my netbook, even at an Internet Cafe using Internet Explorer and Winlink's WEBmail facility.
I even get a notification in my VX-8 when I switch it on and send an APRS BEACON if there is any radio e-mail waiting for me and I can even read it and send a short reply with my VX-8 or any APRS capable radio. This works in a similar way POP works in your PC with Outlook e-mail program.
I can also send position reports via the Winlink 2000 by sending a short radio e-mail whenever I connect to the system to read or send e-mail, and more...
For more information about Radio e-mail you can visit Winlink 2000 WEB site here and read all the information you need.
Best Radio E-mail System?
As a conclusion I must say that the best and most reliable Radio e-mail system is Winlink 2000, others don't even work. All we need is a PACTOR 2,3 or 4 modem or an RPR modem on HF and a cheap-small netbook computer with either Windows or Linux running Airmail or RMS Express. We can also access our WINLINK Radio e-mail via APRSLink by using an APRS HT, such as a TH-D7/D72, a VX-8 or an APRS capable mobile radio, such as a TM-D700/D710 and a Yaesu FTM-350/400.
SoundCard Mode Systems are out if you value reliability or if you needs Emergency Communications in the field and you value your life because souncdard systems are dead slow and totally unreliable. Look what the WINMOR developer has to say about his protocol in Winlink 2000's WEB Site:
PACTOR vs. WINMOR
Two of the popular protocols used on HF in the WL2K system are WINMOR and Pactor. While WINMOR may not equal P2 and P3 or P4 in total message transfer performance, it provides a cost-effective means of using the system, and is more robust and faster than P1, and faster than P2 in favorable conditions. WINMOR is attractive to anyone who has trouble justifying the high cost and low utilization of a P3-P4 modem. Mariners, who daily use radio email for long-distance lifeline communications at sea, can usually justify a Pactor modem purchase. EmComm agencies who fund equipment purchases are smart to opt for advanced Pactor modems for reliability and ease of use under the stress of emergency operations. Successful WINMOR operating requires skill in making multiple adjustments, and knowledge of the computer's operating system, which often do not lend themselves to success under the pressure of an emergency situation.
Conclusion
I must say that I do not totally agree with Winlink 2000's WEB site. I have tested WINMOR many times and have found out that in real life (i.e. on real HF COMMS) it is not at all faster than Pactor 2, nor is as robust as Pactor 1, never mind Pactor 2, 3 or 4. It is nearly as fast, but always slower than Pactor 2, and Pactor 1 is more robust than WINMOR in all cases. In the LABORATORY, WINMOR seems to be as good as Pactor 2 but this is not the case when it faces bad HF conditions that are common most of the time! Also something they keep well hidden in their comparison is the fact that in it's FAST mode WINMOR needs a 1600 HZ channel when Pactor 2 needs only 450 HZ and if one uses a 500Hz narrow XTAL filter the improvement in SNR makes the difference bigger in favour of Pactor 2.
After all the above, I think that although SoundCard Modes are OK for QSOS such as SSTV, RTTY, PSK31, Olivia and other exotic modes where you don't mind repeating your CALLSIGN, NAME and QTH twice, they are not suitable for RELIABLE and FAST Radio E-mail, DATA Transfer over Radio, Networking over Radio or Emergency Comms, a hardware Modem solution such as an HF PACTOR 2/3 or 4 modem, is the most suitable solution.
Second best might be WINMOR or the new ARDOP (still under development), although it is not much cheaper overall because you either have to pay an amount for a PTC Modem and keep your old PC, or buy a fast new PC with a decent soundcard and/or a suitable interface (a Timewave NAVIGATOR or a microHAM USB Interface III, even a crappy SignaLink USB are not free), then buy WINMOR (it's not free either) and suffer from PC latency, SoundCard instability (notorious in Windows even if you buy a SIGNALINK interface with a built-in soundcard), slower speeds, HF QRM/QRM/multipath distortion while you are struggling to send your very important e-mail or do your important file transfer, if these are important to you of course.
I'm not so sure how much money do you save in the end and if it's worth saving so little at the expense of all above mentioned drawbacks!