Comments on Icom equipment used by ZS6DX

IC-706MKII

Likes:

Dislikes:

IC-756

Comparing the IC-756 with other popular radios, ARRL results.

Likes:

For those of you who keep track of the QST test reports, you might have noticed that this radio holds second place of best receiver characteristics ever tested there, right behind the IC-775. The IC-756 is actually better than the IC-781, a superb radio in its own right, which it replaced.

Icom won’t tell you, but the latter models of the 756 (PRO and PROII) are basically cost-reduced versions of the original 756. The latter was too expensive to produce. Accordingly, the PRO and PROII have considerably less-good receiver characteristics, just compare the QST reports!, what they do have is more bells and whistles, and color ....

I have to admit that I have now fallen so badly in love with the spectrum scope that I feel lost without it, I do not believe I will ever be happy again with a radio without this feature and I am even prepared to scarify some other features for this one. Combined with dual watch it is the ideal way of finding the right spot during a split pile-up or a calling frequency during a contest. My Kenwood and Yaesu rigs have been gathering dust since the 756's moved into the shack! Take note Kenwood and Yaesu! 

Dislikes:

IC-756PRO

Likes:

Dislikes:

Sensitivity problem.
The fully digital processing of IF signals has the disadvantage of additional "quantization noise" on weak signals (by physics). Even when 24 bits ADC are used, the steps are spread linearly. I.e. steps are relatively greater on small ADC counts.
If you compare sensitivity against an (analogue) Rig, the Pro2 looses. On 6 m or any of the higher bands. Doesn't matter. There is always a few dB disadvantage for the digital concept!

IC-756PROII

I have only had a quick look at this radio but I am hoping to have one of these in the shack soon to compare it directly with some other rigs. One weekend is not enough to really judge a fine piece of hardware like this but I will hang on to my original IC-756's for a while yet!

Comparing the IC-756PROII with other popular radios, ARRL results.

Likes:

Dislikes:

Having all those DSP features are nice, unfortunately they are behind fairly broad band 1st and 2nd IF's which allows a strong signal to either pump the gain in the third IF (where both the DSP and AGC lie) or add IMD in the first or second due to in-band overload. This makes it difficult to hear a weak signal if there is a very strong signal 3-4 kHz away from the frequency you are listening to with the new ICOM DSP driven units, this was easier on the quad conversion receiver with 9MHz and 455 kHz IF filters like the original IC-756. It would have been best to put the DSP and AGC in the 1st IF but current (CPU) technology is not quite there yet!

Sensitivity problem.
The fully digital processing of IF signals has the disadvantage of additional "quantization noise" on weak signals (by physics). Even when 24 bits ADC are used, the steps are spread linearly. I.e. steps are relatively greater on small ADC counts.
If you compare sensitivity against an (analogue) Rig, the Pro2 looses. On 6 m or any of the higher bands where sensitivity is important, doesn't matter. There is always a few dB disadvantage for the digital concept ! I know this is a theoretical limit but I am doing some tests and I hope to soon have a "real world" report on how this actually affect us in general operation.

IC-746

Likes:

Dislikes:

IC-471H

Likes:

Dislikes:

IC-707

Likes:

Dislikes:

IC-551

Likes:

Dislikes:

Home